Teen Not Allowed in Animal Kingdom Dressed as Tinker Bell

Teen Not Allowed in Animal Kingdom Dressed as Tinker Bell

A teen claims she was denied entry to Disney’s Animal Kingdom because of her Tinker Bell costume. April Speilman, 15, says she wanted to make her boyfriend’s first visit to Walt Disney World special. She put together costumes so they could dress as Peter Pan and Tinkerbell. She says they had no problems at Disney’s Hollywood Studios but they were stopped before entering the Animal Kingdom and asked to change out of the costumes. Speilman says park officials told her she looked too much like the real Tinker Bell, “They just said, You look too good, so you’re going to have to take off the costume.” Disney did give the couple free clothes so they could stay at the park.

Click here for the video.

Disney’s Dress Policy says:


That they do reserve the right to exclude guests that wear clothing that could create a distraction.  Unacceptable attire includes adults in costumes or in clothing that can be viewed as a costume. The only exclusions are for children under the age of 10. Adult guests can wear costumes to Mickey’s Not So Scary Halloween party but guests dressed as Disney characters are not allowed to sign autographs or pose for photos so that they are not confused with Cast Members.

What do you think? Should adults be allowed to dress up for the parks or no?

 

 

Teen Not Allowed in Animal Kingdom Dressed as Tinker Bell
Please note: some posts may contain affiliate links which means our team could earn money if you purchase products from our site

D2T-1

Let our friends at Destinations to Travel help you book your next Disney Vacation. They are the preferred Travel Agency of Chip and Company and Disney Addicts, and who we use ourselves.

Get started below for your FREE No Obligation Quote.

Book With our friends at Destinations to Travel

Name(Required)
MM slash DD slash YYYY
MM slash DD slash YYYY
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

For the BEST in Disney, Universal, Dollywood, and SeaWorld Theme Park News, Entertainment, Merchandise & More follow us on, Facebook, Instagram, and Youtube. Don't forget to check out the Chip and Company Radio Network too!

YouTube player

Written by:

This account is for Past Writers and Friends who love Disney and want to share that love with you.
View All Posts
Follow Me :

9 thoughts on “Teen Not Allowed in Animal Kingdom Dressed as Tinker Bell

  1. Definitely agree with Disney’s policy. Who wants to be explaining to their young children why there are so many Tinkerbells? Also some of the costumes could even prove to be dangerous to the wearer on some rides were they to get caught in some mechanical part. And yes to the poster above in regards to stranger danger/abductions. What a nightmare not to be able to trust a costumed Disney character if the parks were overflowing with them.

  2. What if it were pedophiles trying to lure children away by dressing in costume? I definitely think Disney did the right thing!

  3. Does she think Disney will change their policy and allow it just because of media involvement? Doubtful. The rules are in place for a reason. A simple search of Disney’s theme park website would have prevented this. I personally would be more embarrassed than anything and wouldn’t want the media attention!

  4. There is a great website by Leslie Kay called DisneyBound. It’s a great way to dress as the Disney characters all the time without being costumey. If you look at the costumes Disney sells they go up to a size for about a 10/11 year old. I think it is their right to protect themselves. I kind of like it being special to kids and the cast members in the parks.

  5. I’m trying to wrap my brain about the fact she got a 15-yr-old boy to dress as Peter Pan. It’s hard to even get them to wear normal pants.

  6. I think it is perfectly acceptable for them to set the rules in their own parks. The character visits are what makes Disney so special and if there were dozens of Tinks or Belles it would be confusing and definitely not as special.

Comments are closed.