Disney Awarded 1.6 Million Dollars in Attorney Fees After Winning Moana Lawsuit

Disney Awarded $1.6 Million After Judge Calls ‘Moana’ Lawsuit Bad Faith Claim

Disney has been awarded more than $1.6 million in attorney fees after a federal judge ruled that trade secret claims tied to Moana were brought in bad faith by animator and writer Buck Woodall.

The lawsuit centered around Woodall’s allegations that Disney stole ideas for Moana from his own project titled Bucky the Surfer Boy, which he claimed he had shared with industry contacts years before Disney released the hit animated film in 2016. Woodall argued that confidential materials eventually made their way to Disney Animation through family connections tied to a former production company employee.

Related: Disney CFO Expects Park Attendance & Pricing to Grow With Expansions

However, the case took a dramatic turn after the court determined Woodall had falsified key evidence.

According to the judge’s order, Woodall falsely claimed he had not seen Moana until 2017 in an effort to work around statute of limitations issues, despite evidence showing he had seen the film in theaters in 2016 and later on DVD.

The ruling also states that Woodall admitted to altering a confidentiality agreement before filing the lawsuit. The document allegedly included the name of a Disney-connected industry figure but was later revealed to have originally been signed by someone else entirely before being modified and backdated.

The judge ultimately concluded the claims were “objectively specious” and pursued with “subjective bad faith.”

A jury had already ruled against Woodall last year after deliberating for only a few hours, finding he failed to prove Disney Animation ever had access to his materials. Because of that finding, jurors never even needed to decide whether Moana was substantially similar to Bucky the Surfer Boy.

The judge also sanctioned Woodall’s attorney nearly $476,000, stating the case was unnecessarily prolonged despite evidence that parts of the claims were barred by time limitations.

Still, the situation is not entirely black and white.

Hollywood has a long history of creators fearing their ideas may have been borrowed after pitching concepts or scripts around the industry. Similar themes, overlapping concepts, and parallel storytelling ideas happen constantly in animation and filmmaking, especially when dealing with broad archetypes or mythology-inspired stories. But courts generally require much more than surface similarities to prove legal wrongdoing, particularly evidence that a studio actually had access to protected material.

Related: Ready, Set, Summer! New Disney Springs Experiences Coming This Summer

In this case, the alleged forged agreement appears to have seriously damaged the credibility of the lawsuit from Disney’s perspective and ultimately became a central reason the court awarded attorney fees.

Disney has not publicly commented on the ruling, while Woodall’s attorney stated they strongly disagree with the judge’s findings and may pursue appeals.

For the BEST in Disney, Universal, Dollywood, and SeaWorld Theme Park News, Entertainment, Merchandise & More follow us on, Facebook, Instagram, and Youtube.

Let our friends at Get Away Today help you book your next Disney or Universal Vacation. They are the preferred Travel Agency of Chip and Company and Disney Addicts, and who we use ourselves.